Codex <> Tactics <> Gallery <> Allies and Enemies <> Tales of the Tigers Other Pages:
|
Guest Commentary Regarding Female
Marines by
Philipp Gresse
Here are the reasons why I (and probably some other people) think that female Marines are not true to the 40K background. Reason #1: The
background says so
If the people in the Imperium who usually are responsible for the geneseed can’t make it work on females, then for sure, a lonely chapter somewhere in the galaxy can’t come up with a method by itself. Not to mention that it would be heresy to tinker with the geneseed that was given to them by the Emperor himself (who apparently also could not make it work on females). Reason #2: Space
Marines are like monks
To make your Space Marines less like monks would not be true to the 40K background, and to do it so you can justify female Marines would be, well, even less true to the background. Reason #3: They
are called “Sons of the Emperor”
Reason #4: No
female Marines are mentioned in the background
One interesting side note about the Ragnar book: at one point, he encounters a female Inquisitor, and he wonders how his view towards females has changed now that he has become a Space Marine. It’s only a small bit, and not necessarily important to this issue, but interesting nonetheless. Now I would like to address some misconceptions some gamers may have concerning the issue of female Marines: “The Imperium
discriminates against females”
Remember that in the Imperium, planets are governed independently and have independent states of civilisation. The Imperium has no control over this. The Imperium only interacts with the planetary culture if they are not loyal to the Emperor or if they are not paying their tributes. It may well be that, on some worlds, females indeed are discriminated against, but that has nothing to do with the Imperium and it surely doesn’t affect the Space Marines. “Not allowing
female Marines will drive women away from the hobby”
Also, while Space Marines surely are the main focus of the Warhammer 40,000 game, not all people want to play them. I know several players who outright despise Space Marines and stick to their Eldar or Orks. If a woman is interested in 40K, then she will find a race or army she likes. If she likes the style and stories of Space Marines, then she might be a little disappointed when she learns that there are no female Marines, but if she previously liked Space Marines, she will not suddenly dislike them. “GW made female
Space Marine models once”
“Warhammer 40K
itself is sexist”
Imperial Guard, Eldar, Dark Eldar, and Tau. These armies are “mixed,” having male and female soldiers. This is most apparent with Eldar and Dark Eldar, where every 4th or 5th model is female and some elite units are all-female. This is partly because of the fact that Eldar and Dark Eldar armies consist largely of “civilians.” The Imperial Guard is (in theory) also mixed, though this is not so apparent from the available figures. Female soldiers are mentioned in the stories and novels and there are some metal figures, like the two from the Last Chancers, the one female Ghost or the Games Day Female Commissar. This might not be enough for some people, but I think it is understandable why GW did not include female models on the IG plastic sprues, forcing all players to use a female model for every 5th Soldier. As mentioned in the Fire Warrior novel, Tau also use female Fire Caste Warriors. As for the lack of obviously “female” Tau models, perhaps they cannot be recognised beneath their heavy armour or perhaps they are visually indistinguishable from males (like other species of animals). Orks, Tyranids, and Necrons. These creatures are (for our purposes) sexless. Orks grow from mushrooms, Tyranids are just insectoids, and though it’s probable that the Necrontyr souls that power the Necron Warriors were from males and females alike, now they’re all just machines. Space Marines and Chaos Space Marines. These are the all-male armies: about 1 million loyal Marines and an unknown number of Traitors. Not much for a whole galaxy. Sisters of Battle. In contrast to the Space Marines, we also have an all-female army. Sisters Orders probably are somewhere between 10 to 100 more times as numerous as Space Marines. So, in total, I would say it doesn’t look that bad in the 40K Universe. Most armies are mixed, some are sexless, and only three are gender-exclusive. One might suggest that it would be discriminating towards men if there were female Marines, because 40K then would have one all-female army but no all-male army. It is true that the focus of Warhammer 40K lies heavily with the Space Marines, and I myself once said that the game might well be called “Marinehammer 40,000.” But in this case, claiming that females are overlooked is not totally fair. There are other game systems set in the 40K universe, like Armageddon or Battle Fleet Gothic, in which Marines are not the most important army. Suddenly, you see a whole universe with an all-male force of 1 million and an all-female force of 100 million. Some may claim that it is still unfair towards females, because the “all-male” soldiers (Marines) are stronger than the “all-female” soldiers (Sisters of Battle). I guess that is true. But the Sisters of Battle were developed and fleshed out quite some time after the Space Marine army list. GW decided to give them their own personality instead of making them the equivalent of female Space Marines. If GW had not done that, and had made them like Female Marines, then there would be no “Sisters of Battle” today. Would that be better? Conclusion
Related
Pages
Posted February 2004. Used with permission. |
Codex <> Tactics <> Gallery <> Allies and Enemies <> Tales of the Tigers Other Pages:
|